Witam,
no dobra, wrzucam wypowiedz jednego kolesia. Walczy w mma, ale nie na topie. Wiekszosc walk wygrywa przez submission, przegrywa przez decyzje. Przyjmuje tez rozne "wyzwania". Ale nie to jest istotne. Prowadzi tez szkole walki i oto, co mowi (a fajnie mowi!!!
):
"Grappling is part of fighting.In fact it is most of it.
I have little use for breaking down striking and grappling into subsections.
I am a fighter.So obviously I do both.
If you are a hobbyist then one is fine.
But if the one you pick is striking then you have not near the selfdefense
ability of a grappler.
I train with about 10 guys that if 99% that you had better grapple.
Half the guys who walk in my door have boxed the other half are bodybuilders or
powerlifters.
Trying to beat men like that down with a fist is very low%.
Striking is extremely limited in dealing with some people.
If you are a 170 pound white guy, and you cant grapple very well.Then you
cannot fight.
A 230 pound black bouncer will rip you to peices, i dont care how skilled you
are.
Look, in MOVIES guys get disabled by one shot alot.
In reality when you are attacked it will be by someone that is meaner and
stronger than you.Beating him down is a pretty weak option.
Grapplers can win with their brains.The brain is the weak link of the
streetfighter.
I have some guys at my school that can get smashed in the head full force by a
220 pound boxer and walk through it.
Those guys can make good strikers.
But the idea of someone like me (a 165 pound fair striker) getting to excellent
in striking then beating these guys is stupid.
It wont happen.In sparring i may do ok.But in a real fight with testoserone
raging they will bullrush me and if i dont clinch im ****ed."
I jeszcze troche o gryzieniu i o paluchach w oczy...
"Speaking as a grappler.
I can bite too.And I can gouge.
Better than ANY striker."
Sie nazbieralo
>>nie ma tego dobrego, co by sie zle nie skonczylo<<
pozdr,
TM