Analiza

I get lots of remarks like: why all this fuzz about fakes, underground labs and counterfeits, my clients grow like weeds on the compounds you style as fake or counterfeit. The answer is lots of these fakes are empty underdosed and if thy aren’t they mostly are not pure and sometimes polluted. The user will grow on it, sure it sometimes even contains more active ingredients then the real ones. But that is not all that matters. I’ll post some graphs to make it better visible. And try to explain why Body of Science attach so much importance at this subject.

Underneath you’ll find a comparison of three Sustanons one original (Portuguese) with the blue line, a fake Sustanon from Belgium with the black line and a fake Sustanon from Egypt with the red line. The analysis was performed for Bodyfitness.

Remarks about the different peakvalues from the left to the right. From 4000-3000 the red line (NILE fake) shows the biggest amount of solvents 58. The black line shows some deviation also.

Between the values 3000-1750 the oil content is visible. It also shows the differences between the oil content and concentration between the original and the fakes.

The third part from 1750-600 shows the actual concentration of the active pharmaceutical ingredients [API](in this case the four different testosterone esters). Here it shows clearly that the fakes contain pollutions and deviant concentrations. The blue line (the original and reference) has the highest concentration of API. For the irregularities in the curves we can blame parts of oils and solvents beside the nonrelated pollutions from the lesser quality API’s.

Between the values 800-600 you can clearly see that the reference curve (blue line) moves very pure from the baseline up. The fake curves again show many irregularities in the curves, especially at the value 750 are lots of other compounds that cause extra peaks.

Most of the readers of this thread wil share our conclusions but wil find it hard to “read” the graphic. This one that shows the gas chromatogram of a two Nile ampoules a real one and a counterfeit.

The peak course in the working matter (API) range is almost identical, with a small difference in the amount of the content of the active ingredients, 221,9 mg/ml at the original against 216,7 at the counterfeit. You see that in the range of the active ingredients the fake shows almost double the amount of reactionpeaks vs the original one. From the 41 st analysis minute on things become interesting, The pollutions in the “counterfeit” show. The peaks are almost as strong as in the active ingredients range (36-41 st minute) This means that this “counterfeit” has an almost similar amount of API content as the original, but shows that for the rest she contains for about 50% (41-50st minute) “scrab” . These “counterfeits” and “fakes” are extremely dangerous in terms of side effects, some will not always show immediately, but what do you think about the long term effects if you would inject these contaminated products for years and years in a row.

Analysis: Andros; testosterone propionate; testosterone. Other compounds included prednisolone and betamethasone

Comment: Sustanon 250 is an oil-based, injected blend of testosterone compounds that depends on the slow release of the different steroids. Although this sample contained three steroid compounds, it did not meet the labelled requirements and would not function as Sustanon is designed to. Prednisolone and betamethasone are cortisone-like-steroids used in treating inflammation. They are not for any other purpose and could in some people cause a severe allergic reaction.
Lot# 94464 10-08
http://www.courant.com/news/specials/hc-steroids1.artnov06,0,1041991.story 

ja tam wole omke

Masarniak o czym to art?

fajne wykresy...tylko nie wiem do konca o co w nich chodzi

DD czemu omke wolisz ? pomijajac roznice w cenie ?